<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wittertainment &#187; Sci-Fi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wittertainment.com/tag/sci-fi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wittertainment.com</link>
	<description>Movie musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Inception</title>
		<link>http://www.wittertainment.com/2010/07/inception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wittertainment.com/2010/07/inception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wittertainment.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I walked into the cinema knowing relatively nothing about this film, and I walked out&#8230;knowing even less. From the moment it begins to the moment it ends, you will be wondering what is going on. These initial questions are simply because those trailers we&#8217;ve been watching all year have hardly prepared us for what is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I walked into the cinema knowing relatively nothing about this film, and I walked out&#8230;knowing even less. From the moment it begins to the moment it ends, you will be wondering what is going on. These initial questions are simply because those trailers we&#8217;ve been watching all year have hardly prepared us for what is about to happen. Most of us just buy a ticket on our faith in either Christopher Nolan or Leonardo DiCaprio.  As the movie progresses, your questions grow deeper, more layered, just as the dreams you are viewing excavate the furthest reaches of the unconscious. It&#8217;s an absolute ride, and in IMAX, it&#8217;s astounding.<span id="more-272"></span>It&#8217;s easy to see how this is the product of Nolan&#8217;s work in Memento. It deals with the same issues of our narrator&#8217;s reliability and questions of reality. Both main characters have a tragic self-awareness that seems like a plus in the beginning of the movie, but by the end, you&#8217;ll wonder if what they trusted to be true and what you trusted to be true is even true at all. Like the dreams themselves, the plot lines and characters begin to fall apart, but our Architect, Christopher Nolan, is the one pulling the strings. This is a film that moves beyond its medium and pulls you in. I&#8217;d almost say it breaks the fourth wall without even trying to.</p>
<p>It goes without saying that the special effects are one of the highlights of Inception. This will probably be The Matrix of our time, but in a much subtler way. As Dom says, &#8220;It&#8217;s only when you wake up that you realize there was something strange.&#8221; This strangeness is embraced and pulled throughout the film. However, the mazes, infinite staircases, and alternate realities these special effects create are not limited to just providing an aesthetic wonder, but they serve to symbolically reinforce many of the main issues of the film. The paradox of an infinite staircase will be itching your brain for a few hours after you finish watching.</p>
<p>The performances are pitch perfect. I initially thought that the characters were a bit one- dimensional and not incredibly developed. Don&#8217;t be alarmed though. Nolan hasn&#8217;t lost the touch that created his Batman and his Joker. I believe there are deliberate reasons for this lack of background, which will surely feed into the theorists that will begin sprouting all over the internet after this weekend. Leonardo DiCaprio and Marion Cotillard provide the emotional and narrative center of the film. Being the Oscar winning and nominated actors they are, these roles are played beautifully. It&#8217;s as if they don&#8217;t even realize they&#8217;re the ones we&#8217;re all focused on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll end this now before I start confusing myself even more. It&#8217;s a privilege, though, to see an auteur like Christopher Nolan working today, using the summer blockbuster as his medium. You&#8217;ll leave the theater feeling as if you just &#8220;witnessed&#8221; something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wittertainment.com/2010/07/inception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avatar</title>
		<link>http://www.wittertainment.com/2010/01/avatar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wittertainment.com/2010/01/avatar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chatmandu.co.uk/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Peter Jackson and George Lucas, James Cameron raises the level of technical achievement in film making in every movie he makes, and Avatar is no exception. We have set before us a digital masterpiece of beauty and spectacle, where the technology has once again surprised us, but the beauty and imagination of the artists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Peter Jackson and George Lucas, James Cameron raises the level of technical achievement in film making in every movie he makes, and Avatar is no exception. We have set before us a digital masterpiece of beauty and spectacle, where the technology has once again surprised us, but the beauty and imagination of the artists behind it inspires us even more. Now, as before, much of the movie was green screened, but unlike before, it doesn&#8217;t matter. When live actors are on the screen, they actually look less real than their surroundings. The idealized Na&#8217;vi are sacred, vivid, and real. Live actors are dimly lit, phony profanities in James Cameron&#8217;s digital reality.</p>
<p>The central problem with the story is its appalling lack of originality. The plot, and moment after moment in this film, is ripped from previous movies with reckless abandon. No person who has seen such movies as Dances with Wolves, the Last Samurai, Pocahontas (Dis.) or any number of other movies should be surprised at any part of the story here. The plot is simply an excuse to string together a beautiful canvas of rich, detailed digital fantasy art. Soldiers are portrayed here either as self-hating pansies or narrow-minded bad asses. The Na&#8217;vi are portrayed as a race in perfect balance with the world around them, rather than as products of natural selection with their own defects. Count me as someone who wanted to see a story which had real characters with real people in them, or a twist in the story I didn&#8217;t see coming. I have a few moral qualms with the story as well, which plays out not as a message about tolerance of differences or peaceful coexistence, but as a racist ballad where the sacred Na&#8217;vi have been perverted by contact with the infernal humans and it is the humans that need to be eradicated or exiled.</p>
<p>This is a movie you will want to see if eye-popping visuals and vivid detail at all appeal to you. But if you&#8217;re looking for a compelling story that you haven&#8217;t seen before, look elsewhere. As sci-fi, District 9 is a much better movie, and I would say even Star Trek has the edge on a compelling story line.</p>
<p>There are scenes and individual shots that pop with ethereal beauty. It&#8217;s worth seeing for that reason, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be as fun after multiple viewings. The great thing about &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; was the characters: Han Solo, Luke Skywalker, Princess Leia, R2-D2, Darth Vader, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Yoda and so on. They embodied the other-worldliness of the story, taking the weight off the effects.</p>
<p>In thirty-two years, I don&#8217;t think anyone will remember &#8220;Jake Sully.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wittertainment.com/2010/01/avatar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Time Traveller&#8217;s Wife</title>
		<link>http://www.wittertainment.com/2009/08/time-travellers-wife/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wittertainment.com/2009/08/time-travellers-wife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wittertainment.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on the trailers, I was dreading seeing this film, as it looked like a shallow dull romantic movie with a *ahem* 'clever' twist in the form of the time traveller.  However, I was very pleased to find, within ten minutes of the film starting, that it was clear that I was wrong; it was a complex movie, looking at various problems/blessings that the main character's condition meant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the trailers, I was dreading seeing this film, as it looked like a shallow dull romantic movie with a *ahem* &#8216;clever&#8217; twist in the form of the time traveller.  However, I was very pleased to find, within ten minutes of the film starting, that it was clear that I was wrong; it was a complex movie, looking at various problems/blessings that the main character&#8217;s condition meant.</p>
<p>The first part of the film obviously introduced the main character (Eric Bana), his condition, and the love interest. This was done very cleverly, as she had known him for many years, but it was the first time he had met her. This is because it was an older version of him that travelled back to her childhood and earlier years. This broken timeline continues throughout the whole film, meaning that it could have easily been an incoherent muddle, but the director has controlled things carefully; sometimes following the traveller&#8217;s timeline, so everyone around him changes age suddenly; sometimes following everyone else&#8217;s timeline, so the traveller appears to suddenly age/become younger.</p>
<p>The plot was kept on a low level; no one has to save the world in this film; it&#8217;s just about a couple trying to live a normal life given the bizarre condition the husband has. The time travelling is played to various effects throughout the story; there are a few scenes of comedy, some extremely touching emotional scenes and some genuine shocks. A fair few plot twists come as a surprise, at times drastically changing the tone of the movie, but never coming across as contrived. While there is little to no action, the characters are certainly interesting enough to keep you in this movie, the cast played their parts perfectly; most importantly and everyone acts realistically which really adds to things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wittertainment.com/2009/08/time-travellers-wife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Time Traveller&#039;s Wife</title>
		<link>http://www.wittertainment.com/2009/08/time-travellers-wife-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wittertainment.com/2009/08/time-travellers-wife-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wittertainment.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on the trailers, I was dreading seeing this film, as it looked like a shallow dull romantic movie with a *ahem* 'clever' twist in the form of the time traveller.  However, I was very pleased to find, within ten minutes of the film starting, that it was clear that I was wrong; it was a complex movie, looking at various problems/blessings that the main character's condition meant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the trailers, I was dreading seeing this film, as it looked like a shallow dull romantic movie with a *ahem* &#8216;clever&#8217; twist in the form of the time traveller.  However, I was very pleased to find, within ten minutes of the film starting, that it was clear that I was wrong; it was a complex movie, looking at various problems/blessings that the main character&#8217;s condition meant.</p>
<p>The first part of the film obviously introduced the main character (Eric Bana), his condition, and the love interest. This was done very cleverly, as she had known him for many years, but it was the first time he had met her. This is because it was an older version of him that travelled back to her childhood and earlier years. This broken timeline continues throughout the whole film, meaning that it could have easily been an incoherent muddle, but the director has controlled things carefully; sometimes following the traveller&#8217;s timeline, so everyone around him changes age suddenly; sometimes following everyone else&#8217;s timeline, so the traveller appears to suddenly age/become younger.</p>
<p>The plot was kept on a low level; no one has to save the world in this film; it&#8217;s just about a couple trying to live a normal life given the bizarre condition the husband has. The time travelling is played to various effects throughout the story; there are a few scenes of comedy, some extremely touching emotional scenes and some genuine shocks. A fair few plot twists come as a surprise, at times drastically changing the tone of the movie, but never coming across as contrived. While there is little to no action, the characters are certainly interesting enough to keep you in this movie, the cast played their parts perfectly; most importantly and everyone acts realistically which really adds to things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wittertainment.com/2009/08/time-travellers-wife-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
