<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wittertainment &#187; Horror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wittertainment.com/tag/horror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wittertainment.com</link>
	<description>Movie musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Wolfman</title>
		<link>http://www.wittertainment.com/2010/02/the-wolfman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wittertainment.com/2010/02/the-wolfman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chatmandu.co.uk/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many bad things about The Wolfman. Performances range from dry to laughable, the music simply doesn't fit with the overall tone of the film and the script is a mess to say the least. After reading some reviews on IMDB I just don't understand how anybody could take this movie seriously.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many bad things about The Wolfman. Performances range from dry to laughable, the music simply doesn&#8217;t fit with the overall tone of the film and the script is a mess to say the least. After reading some reviews on IMDB I just don&#8217;t understand how anybody could take this movie seriously.</p>
<p>All that said I have to say some lines and sequences are actually quite enjoyable, due to the sort of B-movie feel. The gruesome evisceration of people stops being horrible and quickly becomes comical, when viewed with a sense of satire. In fact, some of the performances, specifically Anthony Hopkins&#8217; and Hugo Weaving&#8217;s, one could get the vibe that they weren&#8217;t really trying and were going more for a fun depiction of their characters and less of complex ones.</p>
<p>So, overall, when watched like a B-Movie it&#8217;s more fun. My understanding was that it was going to be a dark, complex, visionary re-telling of a horror classic. And it could be that therein lies the problem&#8230;</p>
<p>From what I understand, previews for the film give off more of a serious tone. People expecting that will be truly disappointed, perhaps even appalled. People willing to watch it for a fun, just-for-kicks gore-fest, may be more satisfied.</p>
<p>Bottom-line: Don&#8217;t expect a classic. Expect a popcorn horror flick, and MAYBE you&#8217;ll like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wittertainment.com/2010/02/the-wolfman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paranormal Activity</title>
		<link>http://www.wittertainment.com/2009/10/paranormal-activity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wittertainment.com/2009/10/paranormal-activity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wittertainment.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paranormal Activity is one of those rare movies that stays with you long after it&#8217;s ended because the storytelling is so deftly handled. Very simple elements, almost bordering on clichés, are used in a way I can only describe as virtuoso. The sound of footsteps proceeding and receding, seeing a light turn on &#38; off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paranormal Activity is one of those rare movies that stays with you long after it&#8217;s ended because the storytelling is so deftly handled. Very simple elements, almost bordering on clichés, are used in a way I can only describe as virtuoso. The sound of footsteps proceeding and receding, seeing a light turn on &amp; off down the hallway, the slight movement of a door in the context of the plot take on a significance way beyond what you would have thought possible. My fears that I would be underwhelmed were unfounded.</p>
<p>The biggest surprise to me was the amount of humor in the movie. The best scary movies have elements of humor in them to prevent them from being too grim to enjoy. The humor in Paranormal Activity not only served as a contrast to the intensity of the more frightening scenes, but also helped the audience to empathize with Katie and Micah, who were a likeable dare I say pretty normal couple.</p>
<p>My only complaints are minor ones.  Even though I liked the ending and found it especially disturbing, the fact that the effects went beyond the reality of the entire movie to that point took the movie out of character a little and made it less believable. I certainly hope the DVD release contains the other endings as bonuses.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a lot of scary movies, and Paranormal Activity is right up there with the best of them, if not on top, certainly within spittin&#8217; distance.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s due for release in the UK on the 27th of November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wittertainment.com/2009/10/paranormal-activity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
